I think I set off a social media rumble yesterday with a Tweet about new school legislation from state Sen. Alan Clark and so I probably should provide some further clarification, though the bill remains a bad idea that would punish schools that need the most help.

I Tweeted that Clark had proposed to “cut poverty funding to schools with low test scores, typically the poorest schools.” That’s accurate. I also posted a link to the bill. Many readers read the bill and were horrified by the title, which says in part that it is: “to reduce the amount of national school lunch state categorical funding … if the overall reading readiness is below a certain percentage.”

Advertisement

I knew what this meant. Many did not. School lunch categorical funding is shorthand for a special financial payment that is distributed for instructional help and other purposes to schools with high percentages of poor students as determined by the number eligible for free or reduced-price lunches. Thus, though it is national school lunch state categorical funding, it is NOT “lunch money.”

It’s still flawed. As an education specialist put it:  “It’s completely ass backwards because it cuts funds to the schools that need them most, but it would not cause kids to starve.”

Advertisement

I knew that all along. But to the extent I contributed to the confusion, sorry.

By the way: There ARE problems related to this money. Many schools aren’t using it as it was intended. There’s been talk, in fact, of a lawsuit challenging the state’s allowance of dubious uses of this money or simply as a general budget supplement. Fixing that would be a better idea than taking it away from schools in dire straits.

Advertisement

Here’s a backgrounder on the subject by Arkansas Advocates for Children and Families.

KARK/Fox plans to delve into the subject tonight, so check it out.

Advertisement

Arkansas Times: Your voice in the fight

Are you tired of watered-down news and biased reporting? The Arkansas Times has been fighting for truth and justice for 50 years. As an alternative newspaper in Little Rock, we are tough, determined, and unafraid to take on powerful forces. With over 63,000 Facebook followers, 58,000 Twitter followers, 35,000 Arkansas blog followers, and 70,000 daily email blasts, we are making a difference. But we can't do it without you. Join the 3,400 paid subscribers who support our great journalism and help us hire more writers. Sign up for a subscription today or make a donation of as little as $1 and help keep the Arkansas Times feisty for years to come.

Previous article Voucher creep in program for students with disabilities Next article Back-to-school news roundup and the open line