The NY Times has an interesting article with local resonance. It’s about the University of Alabama suing an artist who sells paintings depicting famous moments in Alabama football. Stupid move by Bama, in any case.

But this case could provide some sound guidance on Arkansas’s even stupider move to crack down on a fan who made some T-shirts complaining about Coach Houston Nutt. The UA claimed it had rights on making anything relating to Hog football, including Nutt’s image. A relevant passage on the case in Alabama:

Advertisement

Mr. Moore has asked Judge R. David Proctor of the Federal District Court in Birmingham to dismiss the case on First Amendment grounds. His brief cited a decision of the federal appeals court in California ruling that a trademark owner “does not have the right to control public discourse” if “the public imbues his mark with a meaning.”

After the citation, Mr. Moore’s lawyer, Stephen D. Heninger, added a parenthetical aside. “Who could argue with a straight face,” he asked, “that the cultural significance of Alabama football has not assumed such a role?”

Advertisement

 

Invest in the future of great journalism in Arkansas

Join the ranks of the 63,000 Facebook followers, 58,000 Twitter followers, 35,000 Arkansas blog followers, and 70,000 daily email blasts who know that the Arkansas Times is the go-to source for tough, determined, and feisty journalism that holds the powerful accountable. For 50 years, our progressive, alternative newspaper in Little Rock has been on the front lines of the fight for truth, and with your support, we can do even more. By subscribing or donating to the Arkansas Times, you'll not only have access to all of our articles, but you'll also be helping us hire more writers and expand our coverage. Don't miss out on the opportunity to make a difference with your subscription or donation to the Arkansas Times today.

Previous article Boomtown, NW Ark. Next article Let the race begin — UPDATE