Republican debate rehash:

David Yepsen of the Des Moines Register, an important pundit because of Iowa’s primary influence, thought Mike Huckabee helped himself by appearing “presidential” in his squabble with Ron Paul. Different strokes, I guess. Yepsen thought, overall, McCain won, which I can’t quarrel with. I thought Giuliani did very well, but I”m more disposed toward him philosophically.

Advertisement

Ross Douthat of the Atlantic thought Huckabee’s forumulation that the war was a mistake but America’s honor required that the surge be sustained may have been a “break-out moment,” even in New Hampshire, which isn’t friendly toward the war.

The NY Times news coverage led with Thompson and, like everyone else, mentioned the Huckabee-Paul exchange, noting that it put Huckabee on the side of McCain as a vigorous war defender. For the long run, not a great position, I wouldn’t think. NY Times blog saw the debate as a possible turn-around moment for McCain. You’ll find a link to a debate transcript at both NYT links.

Advertisement

Over the Fix, the Washington Post blog, Chris Cillizza’s man-crush on Mike Huckabee wasn’t quite so much in evidence as normal, though he thought the Huck’s squabble with Ron Paul “a nice moment.” But his summary concluded that McCain “stole the night” and that events reinforced the notion of Romney and Giuliani as front-runners. Post news coverage treated the debate as secondary to Fred Thompson’s announcement on Jay Leno. Same approach for LA Times.

Interesting comment from conservative blogger tracking the “people meters” on the strongly Republican focus groups assembled by Fox News. The message “win in Iraq” drew the strongest consistent response. The Huck has a sure sense of the political jugular apparently. It matters not that his message was contradictory and that he offers no plan deeper than staying the course. He has an unerring sense for finding middle C.

Advertisement

An absolute love letter to Huckabee from the New York Observer makes my point.

Invest in the future of great journalism in Arkansas

Our state is a powerhouse in agriculture, yet the stories of our hardworking farmers are often overlooked. Help the Arkansas Times change the narrative with your contribution. Matched by $25,000 from Report For America, your donation enables us to hire a reporter dedicated to covering agricultural and environmental issues in The Natural State. Together, we can ensure that the efforts and innovations of our 49,000 family farmers are highlighted and appreciated. Support us today and take pride in advancing Arkansas’s agricultural legacy.

Previous article Editorial Next article Once more with feeling