A federal judge has ruled that Oklahoma cannot seek monetary damages from poultry companies for alleged pollution of watersheds by poultry farmers because the Cherokee Nation was not part of the case.

Arkansas officials are crowing, such as Attorney General Dustin McDaniel.

Advertisement

   “This is an extremely significant ruling in this case and is a victory for Arkansas’s farmers. While this ruling does not end the case, it is most certainly a major setback for Oklahoma’s lawsuit.  It is my strong belief that  Arkansas farmers have been in total compliance with our laws.  I have been talking to farmers and representatives from the Arkansas agriculture industry since the ruling came down, and they all hope that this marks the beginning of the end in this litigation.  I believe that they have just cause to think that it is.  This ruling is devastating to the State of Oklahoma’s case.”

Perhaps so. But this is not a merits of the case ruling. Oklahoma’s claim for injunctive relief on use of poultry litter in the Illinois River watershed continues.

Advertisement

Arkansas Times: Your voice in the fight

Are you tired of watered-down news and biased reporting? The Arkansas Times has been fighting for truth and justice for 50 years. As an alternative newspaper in Little Rock, we are tough, determined, and unafraid to take on powerful forces. With over 63,000 Facebook followers, 58,000 Twitter followers, 35,000 Arkansas blog followers, and 70,000 daily email blasts, we are making a difference. But we can't do it without you. Join the 3,400 paid subscribers who support our great journalism and help us hire more writers. Sign up for a subscription today or make a donation of as little as $1 and help keep the Arkansas Times feisty for years to come.

Previous article A zombie army of Kris Allen look-a-likes prepares to strike Next article The line is open