Here’s that Blanche Lincoln poll. It’s a robopoll that shows her in a statistical tie with three — and nominally trailing two — virtually unknown Republicans. They are Gilbert Baker, Curtis Coleman and Tom Cotton.
This poll is, in other words, a Lincoln-against-the-world poll. The grass is usually greener in such polls. Back in 1992, polls indicated Bill Clinton couldn’t even carry Arkansas for president against the anybody-but option.
Lincoln’s favorable rating is low and declining. And 40 percent, or thereabouts, say they’ll vote for anybody but her. That’s about where even a nutbag Republican typically starts against just about any Democrat in Arkansas. Remember Jim Holt?
Elections, in the end, are about real matchups. Inevitably, beliefs of both candidates are exposed. Is Blanche Lincoln that bad? Is Tom Cotton that good? That’s what elections are about.
This illustrates, still, the tough circumstances that Lincoln faces. It’s not exactly news. In the end, some 20 percent of the Arkansas electorate will decide the election, as they have before. Will they reject a known quantity for an unknown one?
Polltakers note, moreover, difficulties with Democratic voters. Will they really reject Lincoln for a Religious Right Republican or a throwaway vote on a Green candidate to help elect such a Republican? (Or for a nominal Democrat in the primary if Bob Johnson runs?) That’s called cutting off your nose to spite your face. But it’s been done before.
(UPDATE: The Arkansas Leader welcomes Bob Johnson as a potential candidate. There’s lots more of this where that came from.)
Already, the purists are saying Lincoln must be punished if she stands in the way of acceptable health legislation. Tell me how electing a Republican four-square against EVERY SINGLE OPTION OFFERED BY DEMOCRATS punishes anyone but the entire U.S. population.