The Arkansas Supreme Court ruled today that a lawsuit challenging a three-part constitutional amendment proposed by the legislature must first be heard in circuit court. The Supreme Court said it had “original jurisdiction” to hear only challenges to amendments initiated by the people, not those referred by the legislature, as was the case with ballot Issue 2.

It gave no hint of how it would rule on the merits of the case, which contends that the legislature rolled up three separate measures — on consumer interest, on interest on government bonds and on bonds for energy efficiency projects — into one. There are also technical issues over the ballot title.

Advertisement

An identical suit was already pending in Circuit Judge Mary McGowan’s court. She’d delayed action so that the Supreme Court could decide the original jurisdiction question.

Here’s today’s opinion. Issue 2 will remain on the ballot. It’s possible a final decision could come after the election. The court could rule that votes not be counted or the election voided.

Advertisement

Be a part of something bigger

As a reader of the Arkansas Times, you know we’re dedicated to bringing you tough, determined, and feisty journalism that holds the powerful accountable. For 50 years, we've been fighting the good fight in Little Rock and beyond – with your support, we can do even more. By becoming a subscriber or donating as little as $1 to our efforts, you'll not only have access to all of our articles, but you'll also be helping us hire more writers to expand our coverage and continue to bring important stories to light. With over 63,000 Facebook followers, 58,000 Twitter followers, 35,000 Arkansas blog followers, and 70,000 daily email blasts, it's clear that our readers value our great journalism. Join us in the fight for truth.

Previous article ‘Marriage Ref’ casting in town this weekend Next article Willie to Mountain Home