Mother Jones reports in detail what has long been obvious — Mike Huckabee used his personal PAC to funnel money into his family and for fund-raising for his personal political operation.
It’s a story that reveals Hucksterism in all its glory.
Support the Arkansas Blog with a subscription
We can't resist without our readers!
Politics is a family business for potential Republican presidential candidate and former Arkansas governor Mike Huckabee. Over the last six years, the Fox News host’s political action committee, which was created to raise money for GOP candidates, has paid nearly $400,000 to members of Huckabee’s extended family, while spending just a fraction of its multimillion-dollar fundraising haul on the Republican contenders.
Huck PAC, which Huckabee launched in 2008 after dropping out of the Republican presidential race, “is committed to electing conservatives across the nation at all levels of government,” according to a statement on its website. But according to review of Federal Election Commission records, a significant portion of the money the PAC has collected has gone into the salaries of family members or the coffers of direct-mail fundraising firms.
Katherine Harris, Huckabee’s niece, was paid $165,042 between 2008 and 2013 (plus benefits), first as a staffer for the PAC and then as a contract worker. Sarah Huckabee, his daughter, received $104,308 between 2008 and 2010 as the PAC’s executive director. And Huckabee’s daughter-in-law, Lauren Huckabee, who Politico reported in 2012 manages her father-in-law’s schedule, donor relations, and endorsements, has been paid $111,274 for her work at Huck PAC. The ex-governor’s short-lived non-profit, America Takes Action, Inc. previously paid her $60,548.
Chad Gallagher, a spokesman for Huckabee, said family members haven’t been paid by the PAC in the last two years.
But nepotism isn’t the only angle.
Since its inception, Huck PAC has never spent more than 12 percent of its funds on candidates or other PACs. It gave only 5 percent of its revenues—that is $47,000 of $1,063,142—to candidates during the 2012 cycle, when Huckabee briefly flirted with a second presidential run. Meanwhile, the PAC’s budget has increasingly flowed to firms that specialize in direct-mail fundraising, a notoriously inefficient process that can cost a PAC almost as much money as it yields. So to a certain degree Huck PAC donors are not underwriting Huckabee’s favorite conservative causes; they’re financing more fundraising.
As a first-time presidential candidate in 2008, Huckabee projected an image of a thrifty up-and-comer, cutting costs at every opportunity and staying at the cheapest motels. Before he dropped out of the race, he even left the campaign trail to give a paid speech in the Cayman Islands because, he said, “you’ve got to work for a living and pay your bills.”
Since then, he’s made a bundle as a Fox News host, book author, and commentator, and he’s also cashed in on his status as a social conservative favorite much in demand at GOP events. Last July, Politico reported on Huckabee’s penchant for charging state Republican parties for expensive, chartered flights—$15,944 for one trip to Iowa—when traveling for meetings and fundraisers. In 2009, an Alabama congressional candidate was forced to take out a loan after Huckabee’s $33,990 speaking fee ended up costing more than the candidate had raised at the fundraiser.
Could the bloom that Huckabee enjoyed from a generally unquestioning media in 2008 be fading for his 2016 presidential candidacy? One more item to come next on that point.