This is an important article 
about all the things the paid Walton lobbyists and Walton-owned politicians won’t tell you about the down side of the billionaires’ push for “school choice,”  as embodied by charter schools.

There’s corruption in many locales (including Little Rock). There’s lack of accountability in the private management organizations that run many of the charters. There’s the creaming of students. There’s the damage done to conventional school districts left  to struggle with more concentrated pockets of difficult students and less money to help them. There’s the fear that charters are merely a transitional step to the voucher system the Waltons preferred in the first place. There’s the fact that the movement is built on myths about the presumed failure of public education, a popular tactic in Little Rock, where the existing public school system, despite being over-endowed with poor students, competes quite well when you compare demographically similar groups of students.

Advertisement

Concludes the author Jeff Bryant:

But what if John Walton’s disappointment in public schools stems from the possibility that Americans, as a whole, want other kinds of “results” from their public schools? What if what they want, as Jitu Brown says of his own community, is the opportunity to “improve our neighborhood schools” instead of having them replaced by the charters preferred by the Waltons?

Meanwhile, as WFF contemplates how to best “soften the ground” for increased school choice, and policy makers ponder the growing impact of philanthropists in education, more communities may have to contend with the reality of schools, public or charter, coming and going based on forces not in their control. Completely lost in the discussion, though, is whether it’s right for the American populace to have its access to education determined by the values and philosophy of a few rich people.

In Arkansas, the prevailing political dynamic favors the rich people. And the Waltons’ paid lobbyist, Gary Newton, spews propaganda hourly in their quest to destroy the Little Rock School District. His latest: More charter schools with predominantly white, upper income students in western Little Rock are good for the Little Rock School District. He also contends the Pulaski County School District should not be allowed to improve its middle school in western Little Rock with a new campus. Competition apparently is OK if the deck is stacked in favor of Newton’s charter schools. Not so much if it’s a public school district trying to do better.

Advertisement

Invest in the future of great journalism in Arkansas

Join the ranks of the 63,000 Facebook followers, 58,000 Twitter followers, 35,000 Arkansas blog followers, and 70,000 daily email blasts who know that the Arkansas Times is the go-to source for tough, determined, and feisty journalism that holds the powerful accountable. For 50 years, our progressive, alternative newspaper in Little Rock has been on the front lines of the fight for truth, and with your support, we can do even more. By subscribing or donating to the Arkansas Times, you'll not only have access to all of our articles, but you'll also be helping us hire more writers and expand our coverage. Don't miss out on the opportunity to make a difference with your subscription or donation to the Arkansas Times today.

Previous article A change in Little Rock police tactics: Less use of force Next article Now available through Chef Shuttle statewide: Taziki’s