Little Rock lawyer David Couch has begun his effort to institute a non-partisan system of drawing congressional districts in Arkansas every 10 years.

Yesterday, Attorney General Leslie Rutledge rejected his first submission of a ballot title and popular name. She cited ambiguities.

Advertisement

Couch expected the first rejection and plans to make changes to deal with Rutledge’s criticism.

Here’s her opinion.

Advertisement

Couch would have a seven-member commission — four split between majority and minority legislative leaders and the other three chosen by those four — draw districts. Among other things, the proposed constitutional amendment would say that the districts should be “reasonably compact” and “no district shall discriminate against or favor a political party, incumbent legislator or member of Congress and not drawn to augment or dilute the voting strength of a language or racial minority group.”

For one thing, she objected to the phrase “independent commission.” She asked: “Independent of whom?” She had many other objections large and small.

Advertisement

In reporting this decision today, the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette quoted Couch as viewing Rutledge’s suggestions as helpful.

I need not be diplomatic. I think the chances of Rutledge ever approving a constitutional amendment that upsets the current system, now firmly in control of a Republican legislature are slim. But miracles happen. A bipartisan, good government movement brought unbiased and common sense districting to Iowa.