Senate leaders today revealed ideas on ethics rules for the chamber in light of recent revelations about rampant corruption in the Arkansas legislature.
Benji Hardy will report details, but early inf
Support the Arkansas Blog with a subscription
We can't resist without our readers!
Oh, and senators will have to take an ethics course.
Stifle your laughter.
Do you need a course to know bribery is illegal?
Do you need a course to know taking money from people with interests you are voting on presents the appearance of
We need laws with teeth. We need more detailed financial reporting as a requirement by law, punishable by meaningful fines when violated and without a mulligan rule.
Speaking of transparency: The Senate still refuses to televise its proceedings or those of important joint bodies like the Legislative Council and Joint Budget.
The proposed rule changes speak of financial “interest” in businesses before the legislature. Does interest mean ownership, or merely being employed by. Would these rules have stopped payment of legal retainer fees to Jeremy Hutchinson or required a disclosure on his part? UPDATE: A financial interest WOULD include being a consultant.
The Senate said the House is on its own. Democratic Chair Michael John Gray said he thinks rising House Speaker Matthew Shepherd will jump right on board with similar.
I’d prefer law enforced by an independent commission, with meaningful penalties, and more definition of ethical misconduct that what appears to be present in the boilerplate issued by the Senate.
The key prohibition is a shall not on anything that “is in substantial conflict” with
The Senate would up details on financial disclosure very slightly. Where now they must report sources of income ranges either above or below $12,500, there’d now be a category between $12,500 and $50,000 and above $50,0000.
Also, there’s a specific requirement for disclosure of work as an attorney or consultant. This is new and significant.
Quarterly reporting will be required of substantial changes in the annual filing.
That ethics committee would take up complaints from members of the Senate. This procedure already existed for the Senate as a whole, but has never been used. Hearings would be public.
UPDATE: The first members of the ethics commission would be, on the GOP side, Missy Irvin, Dave Wallace
Tough questioning ftrom the press today. Nobody was willing to dump on Jeremy Hutchinson, which tells you something about how vigorous future ethics enforcement might be.