Munthlee Parker writes:

“I went to the George Strait concert and heard him sing ‘All My Exes Live In Texas.’ I knew that was wrong, but I didn’t say anything. Then I read in the daily paper about a ceremony at the Airport: ‘Political figures from the present and the past sprinkled the crowd. They included two former governors – ex-Sen. Dale Bumpers and Jim Guy Tucker.’ I can’t remain silent any longer. When will American schools start teaching the proper use of ex- ? Or are we just going to let the Chinese be the only ones who use ex- correctly? Then I guess we’ll start eating with chopsticks too.”

Advertisement

Mr. Parker may be a little too ex-cited, and I certainly hope he’s wrong about the chopsticks. But strictly speaking, he’s identified two errors, at least under the old rules. The usage manual “Success With Words” says “When the prefix ex- is attached to a title (as in ex-president) or a word (as in ex-husband), the resulting term designates the person who held the position immediately before the current holder. The term former should be used to refer to any previous holders of the position.” The rule holds true even if the position is now vacant. Only the last person to hold it is ex-. So George Strait should have sung “My Ex Lives in Texas, And So Do All My Formers,” and Bumpers should have been identified as “former Sen. Dale Bumpers.” After him came Blanche Lincoln. Not there’s John Boozman.

Not all the contemporary authorities are so picky about ex-. The Associated Press Stylebook says only that “usually former is better.”

Advertisement

Remember the great pitcher Dizzing Dean?

“The financial success of the paperback became its cultural downfall. Media conglomerates bought the upstart pocket-book firms and began chasing after quick-money best-sellers … And while paperbacks remain commonplace, they’re no longer dizzingly cheaper than hardcovers.”

Advertisement

Not highly educated, Ol’ Diz probably wouldn’t have noticed the misspelling here. But you’d expect more from the editors of Smithsonian magazine. The word they wanted is dizzyingly.

Arkansas Times: Your voice in the fight

Are you tired of watered-down news and biased reporting? The Arkansas Times has been fighting for truth and justice for 50 years. As an alternative newspaper in Little Rock, we are tough, determined, and unafraid to take on powerful forces. With over 63,000 Facebook followers, 58,000 Twitter followers, 35,000 Arkansas blog followers, and 70,000 daily email blasts, we are making a difference. But we can't do it without you. Join the 3,400 paid subscribers who support our great journalism and help us hire more writers. Sign up for a subscription today or make a donation of as little as $1 and help keep the Arkansas Times feisty for years to come.

Previous article Howdy, Chuy’s! Welcome to Arkansas Next article Behind the scenes of UAMS-St. Vincent merger talks